Trading Psychology
Understand your execution, discipline, and behavioral patterns.
Discipline score
72
Loss size consistency · 49
Holding discipline · 100
Days without a flagged pattern · 67
72
/100
Equal weight across 3 component(s). Measures execution habits, not profitability — a disciplined month can still lose money.
P&L on flagged trades
−$69
Across 4
checked patterns
Sum of net P&L on trades these patterns flagged. Associated,
not proven to be caused by them. A trade caught by several patterns is
counted once.
Current streak
+8
Consecutive closed trades in the same direction of outcome
Today's trade count
0
vs 2 on a typical active day
0
today
Median of your other active days
◆ Your summary
on request · never on load
No written summary yet. Every figure on this page is already computed without one — a summary adds the narrative, not the numbers.
◆ Behavioural briefing
on request · not on load
⚠ Size increase following a loss
16 of the 25 trades that followed a loss were larger than your median position.
16 occurrence(s) ·
25 trades checked ·
+$809.67 on these
✓ Strongest session — US 13–21 UTC
US 13–21 UTC is your best block at +$1,274 over 25 trades. Late 21–24 UTC is your weakest at +$458 over 10 trades.
25 trades in this block ·
+$1,273.64
Low exposure
1 of 4 checks are
currently firing. A count of active findings, not a risk model.
Last closed trade
+$144.31
11 Sep 17:45 UTC
Strongest session
60%
US 13–21 UTC
· 25 trades · +$1,274
Weakest window
—
No block is negative on average
Emotions are never inferred from transactions. Revenge trading,
FOMO and anxiety are not labels this page applies — it reports what happened
and asks you.
Detected patterns
ranked by associated P&L
Pattern
Evidence
Count
Assoc. P&L
1 of 25 active days were in profit at some point and finished negative.
On those days, what changed between the high point and the close?
Try: Consider a stop-for-the-day rule once a session is meaningfully up.
Measured on closed trades in UTC order. A day that ends negative is not evidence of a decision; it is a prompt to look.
High cost
×1
of 25
of 25
−$69
On 0 occasion(s) a new position was opened within 10 minute(s) of closing a losing trade. That window is set from your own median hold time, not a fixed number.
What were you reacting to in those first few minutes?
Try: Try a fixed pause after a losing trade — you choose how long.
Shows what accompanied these trades, not that haste caused it. Both could follow from the same market conditions.
Low
×0
of 68
of 68
$0
Moving stops further away
This connection does not expose historical stop amendments, so this cannot be checked. It is shown as unavailable rather than estimated.
Unavailable
—
—
16 of the 25 trades that followed a loss were larger than your median position.
Was the larger size decided before the previous trade closed?
Try: Decide position size before the previous trade closes.
Size varies for many reasons, including conviction and volatility. This counts occurrences, it does not read intent.
Low
×16
of 25
of 25
+$810
3 of 24 active days went above 5 trades. Your typical day is 2; this compares against 2× that, because you have not set a limit of your own.
What tends to be happening on the days you go well past your usual?
Try: Set a daily trade limit you choose, so the check measures your own rule.
A busy day is not automatically a worse one; the P&L is shown so you can judge.
Low
×3
of 24
of 24
+$837
US 13–21 UTC is your best block at +$1,274 over 25 trades. Late 21–24 UTC is your weakest at +$458 over 10 trades.
What is different about how you prepare for your strongest block?
Try: Protect this block for your highest-conviction setups.
Sessions differ in volatility as well as in how you trade them.
Strength
×25
of 68
of 68
+$1,274
Total on flagged trades
−$69.31
Each trade is counted once even where several patterns flag it.
This is the P&L that accompanied these trades — it does not show the
behaviour caused it.